25 Jul 2025

White House touts Columbia University deal, critics see dangerous precedent

11:39 am on 25 July 2025
NYPD officers stand at the entrance of Columbia University in New York City on May 1, 2024. Clashes broke out on Wednesday at pro-Palestinian demonstrations on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles, as dozens of universities around the United States struggle to contain similar protests. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP)

The US president has targeted Columbia University over the pro-Palestinian student protest movement. (File photo) Photo: AFP

Columbia University's agreement to pay more than US$220 million to the US government to resolve federal probes was not capitulation but a means to restore vital public funding, the university's acting president said on Thursday.

But critics expressed concern about a harmful precedent in what they see as US President Donald Trump's push for greater control over elite US colleges.

Trump has targeted Columbia and other universities over the pro-Palestinian student protest movement that roiled college campuses last year.

Harvard University is fighting the Trump administration in court and critics have likened the Columbia deal to extortion.

CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS - MARCH 12: Students walk through Harvard Yard on the campus of Harvard University on March 12, 2020 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Students have been asked to move out of their dorms by March 15 due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) risk. All classes will be moved online for the rest of the spring semester.   Maddie Meyer/Getty Images/AFP (Photo by Maddie Meyer / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)

Harvard University is fighting the Trump administration in court. (File photo) Photo: AFP/Maddie Meyer

Columbia faced the loss of billions of dollars in future federal funds and the potential revocation of the visa status of thousands of international students, said acting president Claire Shipman.

"This was not capitulation," Shipman told CNN, adding that the deal protected the university's "academic integrity."

Under the settlement, Columbia will pay US$200 million to the US Treasury and a further US$21 million to a fund to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, senior administration officials said.

In return, the university regained access to some US$1.7 billion in federal funding and grants, Shipman said.

The deal comes after the Trump administration in March penalized Columbia over how it handled last year's protests by cancelling US$400 million in federal funding.

It contended that Columbia's response to alleged anti-Semitism and harassment of Jewish and Israeli members of the university community was insufficient.

The school later acquiesced to a series of demands that included scrutiny of departments offering courses on the Middle East and other concessions that were widely condemned by US academics.

Wednesday's deal formalized many of those concessions in what Education Secretary Linda McMahon called an "incredible win" for the government.

"It is our hope this is going to be a template for other universities around the country," McMahon told cable network NewsNation.

"We're already seeing other universities taking these measures before investigation."

McMahon said Columbia agreed to discipline student offenders for severe disruptions of campus operations, bring viewpoint diversity to their Middle Eastern studies programs, eliminate race preferences from their hiring and admissions practices, and end DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) programs.

Columbia law professor David Pozen called the agreement a "shakedown" and said it set a precedent for "pay-to-play" deals the Trump administration is seeking with other schools.

"The agreement gives legal form to an extortion scheme," Pozen said in a blog post, calling it the first time anti-Semitism and DEI have been invoked as the basis for a government-enforced restructuring of a private university.

Shipman said the agreement contained no provisions that "shall be construed as giving the United States authority to dictate faculty hiring, university hiring, admissions decisions, or the content of academic speech.

- CNN

Get the RNZ app

for ad-free news and current affairs