Up for debate: Which party gains from haka privileges surprise?

Analysis - The government blindsided the opposition by postponing a debate about punishments for Te Pāti Māori, but the delay gives all sides two more weeks to plan and rally support.

MPs had prepared for a possible filibuster to enable the presence of Te Pāti Māori's co-leaders Rawiri Waititi, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke on Budget Day.

Such an extended sitting would appeal neither to the opposition MPs wanting to prosecute the bigger issues, nor to the coalition wanting to pass legislation and focus on its Budget.

Perhaps then, Leader of the House Chris Bishop's surprise motion to postpone the debate to 5 June, should have come as no surprise.

"We've just deferred the debate, take the temperature down a notch," he told reporters afterwards. "There will be a debate, and the government will be voting in favour of the the full penalties as indicated by the Privileges Committee. So there will be a debate on it, and there will be a vote, it's just not going to be today.

"This week is Budget week, and frankly, the New Zealand people expect us to focus on growing the economy and getting back to some sort of fiscal sustainability."

The opposition parties had been criticising the government for the moves which could have seen the MPs suspended from Parliament for an extended time, including during the Budget.

Their en masse votes against Bishop's motion may then come as a surprise too. It seemed to be to Bishop.

"Well that was a bit strange ... it's over to them to explain it but I don't think they quite worked out what was going on. I mean Chris Hipkins said - I saw him repeat it in the media, saying on the way in 'we could always adjourn it and come back another day' - well we just literally did that and they voted against it.

"It's over to them exactly what they want, I suspect they probably voted the wrong way, but it's over to them. You have to put that to them."

Labour's leader Chris Hipkins said it was not quite what he had been aiming for.

"What we argued for was for the sanctions to be deferred, not for the debate to be deferred. And there is a difference there, because I think the Māori Party are entitled to know what they're up against. I think this now means that the whole thing hangs over the Parliament for another couple of weeks."

His speech ahead of Bishop's motion laid out the case calling for co-leaders' suspension to be reduced from 21 days to 24 hours - based on the punishment recommended in standing orders for a first offence - and for Maipi-Clarke's to be jettisoned.

"They are being sanctioned because they broke the rules of the House, they behaved in a disorderly manner, and they interrupted a vote of the Parliament, and there should be a sanction for that. But we have never seen a sanction of this nature in New Zealand's history before," he said.

"The committee should clearly set out its rationale in arriving at the particular penalty so that a consistent approach could be followed in the future. I've read the report several times, there is no rationale, there is no criteria that could be followed in the future. This is an arbitrary number plucked out of thin air."

Hipkins said Labour had been trying to negotiate a solution since Sunday, but Prime Minister Christopher Luxon ruled out any compromise over the lengthy suspensions on Monday.

"We reached out to the government and said 'look, we need to draw this to a close, we need to get back onto debating the issues that matter to New Zealanders' ... They didn't even bother to ring us back, so ultimately, the circus that played out today was entirely in the hands of the government."

No contact from National since Monday - but Bishop seemed unbothered.

"Well, it's not my responsibility to keep the opposition informed of everything, it's over to them," he told reporters.

Hipkins told RNZ it may not play out the coalition hoped it would.

"They've given the Māori Party what they want, which is they put the Māori Party back right in the centre of everything and actually I don't think it's reflected very well on Parliament as a whole.

"There's a whole lot of things going wrong for the country. And the government are focused on suspending opposition members of parliament rather than fixing the issues facing the country. I just think it makes the parliament look ridiculous."

He said the government had chosen the timing of the debate, and suggested the coalition should have backed his amendment instead of delaying the inevitable.

"They chose instead to turn it into yet more of a circus, which means the Maori Party will be out there doing their campaigning for the next few weeks, brings the whole thing back again, turns Parliament back into a circus the next time it comes back again, I don't think that's really what the government should be focused on doing.

"I'm concerned about the damage this is doing to New Zealand's reputation as a democracy, but also the damage it's doing to our reputation with New Zealanders, who basically see parliamentarians just squabbling with one another."

Of course, it also distracts focus from the things Labour wants to talk about during Budget time - like the pay equity reversal.

The Budget on Thursday is the next step.

Finance Minister Nicola Willis had a similar view to Hipkins.

"I think New Zealanders don't want to see Parliament tied up with a prolonged debate about procedural matters when there's a Budget to pass," she said.

Te Pāti Māori's Tākuta Ferris said they would be there to contest it.

The party exited Parliament after the adjournment to speak to the protesters gathered on the forecourt.

"We're not here for the accolades, we're here to be a voice for you, so stand with us. What is the call to action? We turn punishment into power," Waititi told the roughly 1000 supporters.

That sentiment, and the haka the protesters performed, surely sets the tone for how Te Pāti Māori intends to respond to the government's punishments.